|
Welcome to the Bruce blog—a weekly update
on news, events and issues affecting life in Cleveland. Reporting
as it happens on transit, development, planning, environment and
arts & culture.
Basically, we write about creative ideas forming,
talk to the people who have an inside track on the issues, and sometimes
offer a commentary of our own. (For disclosure purposes, Bruce blog
is a local, independent writer who also works part-time with nonprofit
organization EcoCity
Cleveland. The opinions expressed here are not necessarily those
of EcoCity or any other organization).
The valiant efforts of cycling advocates convinced
the Cleveland Planning Commission to table the final vote on bike
lanes in the Euclid Corridor last week. The meeting brought light
to why the bike lanes were removed by RTA’s deputy general
manager Mike Schipper and the city director of streets maintenance
Mark Ricchiuto last September 2004.
The pair was under the assumption that the project
would need a new environmental impact study if the street had to
be widened at the intersections in order to accommodate the lanes.
Sources familiar with the project note that the pair based their
decision on a Landmarks Commission guideline
that suggests that sidewalks should not be less than 12 feet in
front of historic buildings. Logic doesn’t support their decision,
the source adds, because the bike lanes can be considered additional
width between the street and sidewalk. In addition, the landmarks
commission set the guideline, but also stated that the city or RTA
could appeal that the sidewalks could be less than 12 feet (apparently
that flexibility was either ignored or forgotten).
In the end, the Planning Commission instructed RTA
and the city to meet with Ohio Department of Transportation officials
to either work out a design exception as the plan stands or spend
a little from the $220 million budget to alter the drawings and
take some width from the sidewalks. The latter will avoid the headache
of trying to take the position that the plan couldn’t be altered
when the evidence and the experts suggest otherwise.
In other cycling news, the city of Shaker Heights recently announced
that it is proposing a bike route from Thorton Park to the Chagrin-Lee
Shopping Center. The city is considering an application for $50,000
from NOACA’s new Transportation for Livable Communities, a
fund that pays for planning and (eventually) projects that enhance
transportation options for cyclists and pedestrians.
The news was met with mixed feelings by critics of
bike routes who say they fail to offer the same visibility as bike
lanes and, thus, are rather meaningless. Bruce blog has learned
that Shaker isn’t ruling out wayfinding signs, a step up from
the generic bike route sign—they at least provide cyclists
with direction and distance information to destinations. The city
is also interested in an off-street paved bike path, presumably
an extension from the Shaker Lakes area heading east. The city did
not specify the exact location of the path except to say it hopes
to connect it to the path around the lakes in Cleveland Heights.
Observers note that the proposals are a decent beginning,
perhaps a warm-up to planning for a bike lane on Lee Road —
an idea that Shaker and Cleveland Heights are rumored to be pursuing
in anticipation of the road being resurfaced.
With the deadline for the first round of TLC planning
grants coming up in mid-February, observers are watching for Shaker’s
next move. In addition, it is rumored that the city of Cleveland
will submit a few TLC proposals (which are capped at $75,000 and
require a 20 percent local match in cash). Bruce blog has learned
that one such proposal from the city will be to fund a study of
the traffic patterns around the University-Cedar Rapid Station.
Since TLC is an attempt to approve transportation options, the study
will most likely focus on how to untangle the twisted knot of Cedar
Hill/Stokes/MLK and open up the area around the train station, which
is crying out for a new beginning.

Efforts to develop high-speed rail service in Ohio
almost got derailed this week. In a cost-cutting move, Governor
Bob Taft split the agency heading up the effort—the Ohio Rail
Development Commission—between the Ohio Department of Development
and the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT).
The rail commission—formed 10 years ago with
a legislative mandate to develop a high-speed Cleveland-Columbus-Cincinnati
rail line—unveiled plans for that line in November as part
of the 860-mile, 32-station Ohio Hub plan (which also would include
a Pittsburgh-Cleveland-Toledo-Detroit corridor).
Putting the plan in ODOT does not specifically halt
the Ohio Hub, but it does give it a small profile in a huge agency,
states
the Ohio Association of Railroad Passengers.
To
read more...

With the cost of building new water and sewer lines
skyrocketing, one local government agency this week called for a
national tax on beer and soft drinks to pay for it, The Plain
Dealer reported.
Bruce blog wonders, is it equitable for the consumer
of a six-pack in Parma or a 2-liter in Glenville to foot the bill
for a new water main and sewer in Avon or Aurora? If regional water
and sewer costs are rising, perhaps we should investigate the cause
of the alarm.
We suspect that the reason our regional sewer districts
are hard-pressed for cash is that we’re overextending our
water and sewer service to accommodate sprawl developments. Paving
over wide swaths of open space and farmland with low-density development
also leads to more stormwater runoff and the need for larger stormwater
receptors and treatment facilities.
Bruce blog admits, there would be some poetic justice
in making people who buy bottled water pay to improve the region’s
water quality. But, it won’t address the source of the rising
costs for water and sewerage – sprawl.
See
the PD article.

Donovan Rypkema, principal of Place Economics in Washington,
addressed the challenge in keeping neighborhood shopping centers
vibrant at last week's annual meeting of FutureHeights.
After dispensing with the usual bromides (the need
for strong public-private partnerships, etc.) Rypkema offered some
pointed remarks for those interested in retaining the character
of districts in the Heights and other urban and first-suburban areas.
“I can’t recall a place where so many
great, historic resources are so unprotected than in Cleveland Heights,"
he said.
You could hear a pin drop in the Cedar-Lee Theater
before Rypkema remarked that historic preservation is one answer,
but Neighborhood Revitalization Districts might be even more appropriate.
Revitalization plans are usually led by merchant associations or
community development groups in areas that have experienced serious
decline. Rypkema seemed to suggest that it's not too early for the
commercial districts in the first suburbs to have a plan to keep
its assets in place.
Rypkema added that in order to fight commercial gentrification,
or the pushing out of independent businesses, the city needs to
maintain varied rents and building types; be sensitive to the needs
of the market when filling empty spaces; say “it’s never
the customer’s fault that they don’t come into the store,
it’s always the merchants'”; and that you can’t
just form a Special Improvement District and hope that will change
everything.
Rypkema added that neighborhood centers shouldn’t
try to compete with big regional malls. “The difference between
Legacy Village and (neighborhood centers) is you have a sense of
evolution, of human influence. To judge its health (ask) are there
people on the street? That’s the number one indicator.”

Countries from Northern and Central Europe and South
America dominated the top spots in the 2005 index of environmental
sustainability, which ranks nations on their success at such tasks
as maintaining or improving air and water quality, maximizing biodiversity
and cooperating with other countries on environmental problems,
the New York Times reports.
Finland, Norway and Uruguay held the top three spots
in the ranking, prepared by researchers at Yale and Columbia Universities.
The United States ranked 45th of the 146 countries studied, behind
such countries as Japan, Botswana and the tiny Himalayan kingdom
of Bhutan, and most of Western Europe.
Read the article on TruthOut.org

Show your support for revitalizing
cities and towns
Senator Kirk Schuring (District 29) is introducing legislation that
will create a 25 percent tax credit for the restoration and rehabilitation
of Ohio's vacant and underutilized historic buildings.
The tax credit will encourage private investment in
historic properties, generate additional jobs and stimulate economic
development within existing communities. Additionally, this credit
should spur greater investments in smaller commercial projects and
Main Street commercial properties of older neighborhoods—particularly
where there is a critical need for community revitalization.
Click
here for talking points to make the case for the "state
investment tax credit."
Click here
for information on contacting your State Senator about co-sponsoring
the bill. Ask your Senator to please contact Senator Schuring's
office at 614-466-0626 by Friday, February 11, 2005. Be sure to
share with your Senator how the proposed tax credit would work in
your community.
Senate bill threatens natural
areas protection
A last minute rider on Senate Bill 18 threatens floodplain protection,
setbacks from streams and wetlands, storm water structures, and
other local measures to protect water quality. This bill is now
in Gov. Taft's hands. He is currently weighing support and opposition
to the bill. The Ohio Environmental Council urges people to take
action now and ask Governor Taft to veto this legislation. Click
here to send a letter. For more information, email
or call 614-487-7506.
NEO, you are the one
The Cleveland Museum of Art won't have to suffer the local arts
community's wrath since it cut the May Show during Robert Bergman's
tenure. The creation of the North East Ohio (NEO) Show, a juried
exhibition open to all locals, should go to some lengths in smoothing
over the rift. Artists 18 years or older living in the 15-county
area have until March 18 to submit one work, in any media, for consideration.
Cash prizes will be awarded and one piece will be selected for the
museum's permanent collection. Click
here for an entry form or call 216-707-6835.

February 17
The future of the Clean Ohio Fund, 1:30-4 p.m. at the Columbus Italian
Club, 1739 W. 3rd Ave., Columbus, OH. Ohio League of Conservation
Voters and Ohio Environmental Council will lead this meeting about
the future of the Clean Ohio Fund (the state's de facto sustainability
fund which is facing a major cutback in state funding). Topics include:
Financial needs to administer programs, communication between communities,
and generating media attention. Email
for more information.
February 24
Cleveland Urban Core Project, 9-11 a.m. at the offices of the Northeast
Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency (NOACA), 1299 Superior Ave., Cleveland.
Ohio Dept. of Transportation established a Cleveland Urban Core
Projects Advisory Committee to discuss projects arising from the
Lakefront Plan, Innerbelt, Cuyahoga Valley and more. Sit in as some
of the region's planning, nonprofit and business leaders discuss
the possibilities for major urban revitalization stemming from the
billions of dollars being spent on roads and highways.

There are a lot of us who are discussing the closed-door
manner in which the bike lanes were eliminated from the [Euclid
Corridor] project—PUT THEM BACK. Please do not respond with
PR. You guys said you were going to put them in—do it. Adjust
the sidewalks if you have to, but keep your word. We are upset.
This just goes to prove that perspective that RTA is looking down
a tunnel of transportation, rather than stepping back and looking
at the whole picture.
—Jon Eckerle
I would argue that the end condition of the [Euclid
Corridor Project with a bike route] will be worse
than the current condition, because at least cars can now change
lanes to avoid a car-bike conflict. Not so after the project is
completed and there's only one lane for general traffic. All road
users will be squeezed together as the proposed shoulder narrows
significantly at 18 intersections — the very places where
conflicts are already most likely.
Losing the progressive symbolism of real bike lanes
is annoying, but the real horror of the proposal is that it's just
less safe for bicycling than present conditions (this after a 100%
rebuild and hundreds of millions spent). It's also the ONLY viable
nonmotorized corridor between downtown, University Circle and the
suburbs beyond. Putting bike route signs on this redesigned road
is an empty gesture that borders on cynical.
—Ryan McKenzie
I was born on Church Ave. and have lived here
for 33 years. I am troubled by the view that my neighborhood is
little more than an investment market. Houses are not always homes.
Maybe you should look into how many of the people who have become
“urban pioneers” are cashing out when the property value
margin makes them enough of a profit on their "investment."
From my walks, I see a constant cycle of "for sale by owner"
signs and people frequently move out not that long after they moved
in.
—Christopher Merriman,
Cleveland
Imagine in downtown Cleveland a vibrant tree-lined
neighborhood where you could have a home with a nice yard, raise
a family, walk to work, and play without going to the suburbs for
shopping options. Develop the business opportunities in the growing
sustainable energy industries like fuel cells, wind-turbines, solar
panels, biotech, bio-chemical, and other high-tech markets in Cleveland.
And provide exciting recreational activities for fun and health,
(sitting down as a spectator does not count) and you will fill the
city of Cleveland with educated and prosperous people.
Imagine young people, like my son, wanting to move
back to Cleveland from Denver or my niece from Boston. They left
Cleveland because they wanted to live in an exciting, vibrant and
“happening” city. Can we bring them back? A new convention
center or gambling casino won’t lure him home.
—Robert Vance,
Chesterland
The efforts by the Ohio Rail Development Commission
is to develop a high-speed passenger (and improved freight rail
system), not necessarily a bullet train.
UCI bought The Triangle from Cleveland in 1987. Case
purchased it from UCI recently. A source familiar with the deal
says that a mixed-use, pedestrian friendly development was a condition
of the sale.

To email
a comment or a tip to Bruce blog
Receive email updates
of the Bruce blog
|